Friday, 26 December 2008
9.What reflections and connections can you make from this novel?
What is peace? Is peace 'the state prevailing during the absence of war' or 'the state of praying to God during the presence of war'? When God has sent his peace child to scatter peace why is the world so rotten?
I think one possible explanation is plainly the fact that as humans we determine the existence of Peace. If God was in control of the situation, he would have done something by now.
Reflecting back upon the book, I feel a little strange. When an uncivilized tribe such as the Sawi can understand the love of God, what is wrong with me? But then I console myself by arguing back and clinging on to my views on faith. I struggle with faith everyday, I still can't force myself to lean on something I cannot perceive. God doesn't talk to me.
A quote states, “Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned. - Anonymous” What is significance of religion? Two planes flying into a building, terrorist attacks everywhere and sacrifices in a Hindu temple? If there were no religions the world would evidently have one less issue to worry about.
As far as God is concerned, I think if God would stop acting in his mysterious ways and provide some answers to the numerous riddles of the world, some people would understand him better. I am not saying the video below is perfect, or that I agree with everything, but it certainly made me question about the mysterious God. The questions we can't answer is explained by the five letter word: F-A-I-T-H.
I don't quite agree that God comes out as murderous and such in the bible, however the other parts of this video were thought provoking. For example: Innocent children who have done no wrong have cancer. 209 dead people from the recent terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India did not deserve to die in the first place. And young girls don't deserve to get raped.
Every time I try to assure myself that God exists, I fail to understand why God would do this if he is all loving. If God was a bit more clear, a little more obvious, more conspicuous I would attempt faith. But if that was the case, the purpose of faith would be long washed away.
8. Choose a representative passage from the novel that hold significant to you. Type in and comment on its significance.
"At first I sat there confused. Then the realization broke through. They were acclaiming Judas as the hero of the story! Yes, Judas, the one whom I had portrayed as the satanically motivated enemy of truth and goodness." pg-151
Is Jesus the hero, or Judas? Satan or God? It is a game of perspectives! From the Sawi perspective Satan would be the hero. However from a Christian perspective God would be the savior. It astonishes me how cultural upbringing can meddle with one's point of view. It is as if two people were looking at exactly the same object and seeing different objects. But who is right or wrong? I would say that depends on the observer's perspective!
Also, this particular passage stands out to me the most because it reflects of the Sawi's point of view before they were Christian. Before they were Christians betrayal was a part of their culture. They practiced 'fattening with friendship' which is the ultimate betrayal possible. Basically they would invite a friend, make him comfortable and provide him with food. Meanwhile they would conspire ways to murder him. Personally I consider betrayal unforgivable. I think it is wrong to betray anyone who has trust in you. Honestly, what is the importance of trust if we were to betray everyone?
This part of the novel kept ringing back in my head. Gradually I realized why. This passage enhances the Sawi before they were transformed. As I reflect upon the end of the novel it shocks me because the Sawis' development exceeded my realm of imagination. It never occurred to me that God's love would take a monstrous tribe and mold them into individuals with purpose.
7. How is your modern culture different from Sawi tenants?
In India, it is perfectly legal for a Muslim man to have four wives. This is the 'modern culture' that I have been brought up in. Being a part of upper-middle class Indians, I have not visually experienced polygamy, however I am certain it is practiced in the lower illiterate classes.
“Swami” is a Hindi word which is a synonym for God. Surprisingly it also means husband. It is quite evident that even today men remain the dominant sex in society in India. Sawi culture can be described as an exaggerated version of certain Indian traditions. Even though society is changing there are still numerous countries where men are considered superior.Arranged marriages contribute massively to Indian culture. It intimidates me how a woman can marry a man chosen by her parents. How can she make the decision of spending every night with him when she does not love him? (or KNOW him as a matter of fact). It is depressing that something so intolerable happens everyday in my country. Similarly, in Sawi tradition daughters were 'gifted' (to men) by their fathers. Daughters were used as objects of trade between families, in Sawi culture. Hence it can be observed that Sawi culture mirrors aspects of Indian society.
Maybe we don't cannibalize or fatten our friends. Maybe we are blessed with technology and education. Maybe we have the 'idea' of right and wrong yet we choose wrong, which makes us no less of a 'sinner'.
How is my modern culture different from Sawi tenants?
6. How do I relate to faith? How does Don Richardson relate to faith? How do the Sawi relate to faith?
It was faith that drove Don Richardson to seek out for the Sawi. It astounds me how he could risk his family and his life to improve the Sawi. It was faith that gave him strength and power. He completely gave his soul to God and trusted God to protect and guide him. If I had to give an example of a faithful man of God, Don Richardson would definitely come to mind.
The Sawi related to faith through the peace child. At one point Don Richardson told the Sawi that he would leave if peace wasn't made. The Sawi followed their traditions and 'exchanged children' amongst the two enemy tribes. They believed that if a father can give his son to his enemy, peace will reign. Similarly it can be applied that God gave his son Jesus as a peace child. He died for our sins, so that we could live in peace. (But can we?) This analogy applied to the Sawi and they realized that they don't have to take young babies away from their fathers to make peace, when God has already provided us with his child.
While writing this post it occurred to me, “Where is the peace in the world today?” If God has given us his son to make peace, why is the world so corrupted? Perhaps human race isn't civilized yet, or maybe God was never there.
Faith is an alluring topic that questions me several times. How I relate to it, is how I don't.
Saturday, 6 December 2008
5.How does Faith relate to the world in which we live?
I wake up. I brush. I eat. I go to school. I talk. I listen. I learn. I close my eyes and fall asleep. Here are the parts that I didn't write: I pray to God. I have faith him, I know he loves me, I know that I will live a good life and after I die I will join Him in heaven. I didn't write this because I am not sure.
Another reason why faith is important is because people want to be secure not only when they are alive but also after they die. To some people it works just like an 'insurance.' Ask yourself this, “Do you KNOW for sure that there IS a heaven and hell? Have you ever visited heaven or hell? Do you KNOW for sure that they are THERE?” Some people might say 'yes' as the Bible says so. Christians would disagree with me here (which is totally fine) but I find it a little difficult to believe that a sea was parted, miracles were cast, dead people were brought to life and God actually spoke to people. It sounds like a fictional tale to me.
(I distinctly remember that when I was new to TCIS, someone told me that “You will go to hell if you don't become Christian.” I laughed my head off because I thought it was a joke. It was beyond my wildest imagination that people believed in the concept of hell. Now, I have a better understanding of Christianity, therefore I don't find it funny.)
Imagine that there is no heaven or hell. You die and you find out that there was never a God, but you believed in him, because you had blind faith of his existence. Would you be satisfied with yourself if everything you believed in had been a fabrication of truth? I wouldn't.
Friday, 5 December 2008
4.What concepts in the Sawi culture intrigued / reviled / saddened / angered / surprised you?
When I read about the practice of cannibalism my eyes widened(literally) and I visualized very disturbing events in my head. I had always limited my thoughts to the fact that stealing a person's life was unethical. However through the contents of 'Peace Child' cannibalism successfully provided a new 'panorama' in my mind's eye. Previously I thought "What can be worse that killing a person?" was a rhetorical question. ("Killing a person and EATING them?!#$??"). Personally I think that it is crucial to inquire and analyze cannibalism, instead of underestimating its practice due to our prejudices. I hope I accomplish that through this post.
The concept of cannibalism intrigued, reviled, saddened, angered and surprised me the most. It was interest that drove me to move my lazy fingers and research the topic. Basically cannibalism is used as a weapon to show that one has completely devastated another to their flesh and bone.
A certain group of Hindus called Aghoris practice cannibalistic traditions in India. They fish for corpses in the Ganges (the 'holy river of India where dead bodies are dumped) and feed on the raw dead flesh. They define themselves as followers of 'Shiva'. They claim to be scientists trying to discover how matter converts from one form to another. It astonishes me that cannibalistic tribes exist in MY COUNTRY, (I was completely oblivious to this until I researched) and here I was critiquing the Sawi.
Another circumstance where cannibalism takes place is when humans discover themselves in crisis of food. During World War two, the Japanese troops ate dead bodies because their food ran out. Today, in North Korea people cannibalize due to lack of food.
Now comes part where I question my wits, and ask myself, if cannibalism is vice. As Samuel Butler said, "Cannibalism is moral in a cannibal country." Since I am not a citizen of a cannibal country, I am going to cling to my prejudices and conclude that Cannibalism is immoral. However I think that when a person is famished, cannibalism can be expected. When a person realizes that they will die, (due to lack of food) they make their ultimate attempt to survive. For example: If two friends are living without food over a long period of time, and one dies, the other KNOWS that he will too. So, he decides to feed himself the only source of food that lies before him. If it was me I would just die instead of 'living off' the other person. But maybe I am saying that now because I have never been in that situation. (OK, I am scaring myself)
How can I judge a situation when it is a question of cannibalism for survival?
As I was researching this quote struck out to me by Stanislaw Lec who inquires, "Is it a progress if a Cannibal uses a fork?" (Inside they will always know they were a cannibal).
I think I bounced off to different tangents while writing this entry so l am going to try to sew up my final thoughts through the next few sentences. Cannibalism is unethical. (Unless it is a matter of starvation). Cannibalism takes place today (How can we socialize about the Sawi? LOOK AROUND). Change can be brought, and if every 'cannibal eats with a fork', the human race has made some progress.